The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

+(1, x) → +(+(0, 1), x)
+(0, x) → x

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) InfiniteLowerBoundProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The loop following loop proves infinite runtime complexity:
The rewrite sequence
+(1, x) →⁺ +(1, x)
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [ ].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(INF, INF)